Hey, how is it going today? It’s me Dee at 3 from BraidersCourse.com. Today we will be talking about Madame CJ Walker and Annie Malone two of America’s African American great pioneers. First off is Madame CJ Walker Miss Walker first begin the creation of her products in the year 1888. She found herself divorced with a daughter living in St. Louis Missouri where she begins more like an ambassador program for African American recently freed women. This ambassador/marketing program consisted of selling Mrs. Walker’s premium hair products. The women begin selling the products from state-to-state creating at what we would call today a multi-state membership of natural hairstylist. Madame Walker also went on to create several beauty salons, several beauty schools and a manufacturing warehouse for her products. While living in St Louis she became good friends with Annie Malone. Annie Malone manufactured and patented the pressing comb. This pressing comb is still used today. Many people believe Madame Walker invented the pressing comb. However, it was Annie Malone who patent the pressing comb and has a first trademark for the pressing comb. These two women left a legacy today that many women are mimicking today. Madame Walker was the first woman on the stock market. She also owned a home on the Hudson River next to Rockefeller. Annie Malone is known for her childhood home in St.Louis Missouri she was a great philanthropist and to this day there is a parade the Annie Malone parade.
Thank you again for your attention and if you looking for me Denise I’m at braiderscourse.com.
Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration License is the key to a Natural Hair Braider Board.
I want to explain more on how the Minnesota Hair Braider Registration Licensees “simple hair devices” are being manipulated into being in the Board of Cosmetology favor through legal cases brought on by the Institute for Justice.
Why should we care? Because it Black Women #AmeicanDOS who bare the bottom of the barrel to healthcare and HIV and HPV infections. However most don’t know how they contracted the virus.
I’m here in your face telling you while white women protect them selves you are the cost.
A. In consequence, Judge Isabell Gomez’s Court Order, Section III. Agreed Order, paragraph 8., letter B., and page 15.
Gives the Board the authority to make rules and change the definition at will for “Simple Braiding Devices” it reads:
“Hair Braiding, Simple Braiding Devices, Hair Braiding Services, and Hair Braiding are defined are to be defined in Minn. R 2642.100 (which was later repealed and renumbered to Minn.R 2105) and Hair Braiding, Hair Braiding Services and Hair Braiders are to be construed as exempt from Minn. R 2100(2003), 2646(2003) and 2644(2003).
This gives the Board the authority to overwriting the definitions and rules for Hair Braiding, Simple Braiding Devices, and Hair Braiding Services.
But grants exemptions ONLY to Hair Braiding, Hair Braiding Services, and Hair Braiders.
Therefore, allowing the Boards total control over Simple Braiding Devices which includes the ‘needle’.
Unfortunately, this is how the Board can get back into the Health Practices Cataorgy and ask the goverment for more funding in approations through legislation for the health and welfare of the public.
B. The Revisors Rules docket RD4342 denied by Judge Eric Lipman but later approved by Judge Tammy Pust allows AP Estheticians to use Simple Hair Braiding Devices definition separate to create the medical health, safety and sanitation for the welfare of the public claims needed to support the NEW licensing of estheticians.
The Board ask for rulmaking authority over 155A.21 to 155A.36 this mistake includes 155A.28 for Hair Braiders Registration.
I beleive it’s valid enough for this procedural mistake to go back before an adminstrative judge.
In the Matter of the Board of Cosmetologist Examiners’ Proposed Permanent Rules Governing Advanced Practice Estheticians; Minnesota Rules Chapters 2105 and 2110 Section II. Rulemaking Authority.
8. The Board also relies upon its general rulemaking authority under Minn. Stat. § 155A.26, which provides: The Board may develop and adopt rules according to chapter 14 that the Board considers necessary to carry out sections 155A.21 to 155A.36.
Minnesota Board of Cosmetology is ManipulatingIJ.orgcases by Creating Anti-Trust Issues With the Public
Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensee are more POWERFUL than ever before in the current political circus of “GETTING A TABLE” vs a set at the table.
Here is a detailed timeline that I could come up with for a step-by-step of the action taken with the Minnesota Board of Cosmetology and the Institute for Justice.
I don’t know if this is information overload, but feel free to contact me for more of an explanation.
I have provides the links to the pages where you can look at the dates and find the pdf’s, memo or actions for each group.
The groups are:
Licensed to Practice
Institute for Justice and
4/2005-2006 Hair Braider Registration Statue creating ‘simple hair devices which include the needle’.
1/2008 Sample Hair Braider Curriculum
5/2/2011 Medical AP Estithican Regulated-Non Regulated “Licensed Practice in a doctors office”
5/2/2011 Medical Estheticians Disclaimer
3/20/2012 Denise Jarrett eco Hair Braider
2/25/2013 Proposed Online Course
10/7/2013 Medical Esthetician Task Force and Programs created at Saint Paul College
2/3/2015 Medical Esthetician CISDECO substitution for 40 hours continuing education and School Manager License
5/11/2015 1400.2500 Petition statue to Adopt 155A.28 Hair Braider statue
7/20/2015 Denial for 1400.2500 Petition
3/7/2017 Board of Cosmetology Eyelash Complaints of 274
7/15/2017 Eyelash SF2802 Passed without rules
7/16/2017 Eyelash and AP Esthetician Schools Surety Bonds
10/16/2017 Institute for Justice Repeal of both Eyelash and Hair Braiding Proposals
11/16/2017 Adoption of Eyelash Rules
12/4/2017 Launched Eyelash Instructors
3/8/2018 Administrative Judge Lipman Court
2/22/2018 Administrative Judge Pust Court 1st time
6/7/2018 Failed bills for Hair Braiding and Eyelash
8/9/2018 AP Esthetician Curriculum Changes to add Eyelash
8/20/2018 Administrative Judge Pust and Board draft court orders for permanent adoption of APE and Eyelash
8/23/2018 added Revisors rules with Simple Hair devices definition included in rules even though cosmetology does not govern hair braiding
9/24/2018 Adoption of APE and Eyelash enactment goes into effect.
In short, The Board of Cosmetology has deceptive practices on both the Institute for Justice and the public.
The permanent removal from governing hair braiders court order stated that the board was to advocate in good standing for health, safety, and sanitation for hair braider with the governor and legislation.
This was broken in the past legislative session in which the Board of Cosmetology maintained a neutral advocacy for the repeal.